<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geographic domains for Australian communities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kingjason.co.uk/index.php/geogaphic-domain-names-australia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kingjason.co.uk/index.php/geogaphic-domain-names-australia/</link>
	<description>Web development &#183; for charities and nonprofit organisations · by Jason King</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason King</title>
		<link>http://www.kingjason.co.uk/index.php/geogaphic-domain-names-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-10540</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingjason.co.uk/?p=152#comment-10540</guid>
		<description>Hi Leonie,

I can&#039;t remember which websites I tested, I did it hurriedly during your talk at Making Links. And I&#039;m not sure whether all those sites used Community Site in a Box or not.

The only test I did was html validation using validator.w3.org.

Even if a CMS is standards-compliant when first installed, a website editor can quickly stuff up the compliance by added their own duff code. So my quick test doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that Community Site in a Box itself doesn&#039;t validate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Leonie,</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t remember which websites I tested, I did it hurriedly during your talk at Making Links. And I&#8217;m not sure whether all those sites used Community Site in a Box or not.</p>
<p>The only test I did was html validation using validator.w3.org.</p>
<p>Even if a CMS is standards-compliant when first installed, a website editor can quickly stuff up the compliance by added their own duff code. So my quick test doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that Community Site in a Box itself doesn&#8217;t validate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonie Dunbar</title>
		<link>http://www.kingjason.co.uk/index.php/geogaphic-domain-names-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-10539</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonie Dunbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingjason.co.uk/?p=152#comment-10539</guid>
		<description>Hi Jason,

Just read this piece and am intersted in which of the dozen sites you tested as not all of the Community Websites use Community Site in a Box?
Thanks,
Leonie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason,</p>
<p>Just read this piece and am intersted in which of the dozen sites you tested as not all of the Community Websites use Community Site in a Box?<br />
Thanks,<br />
Leonie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

